Post by Andy WalkerPost by David NorthIt's the largest innings victory for 50 years, and 4 of the 6 above
it were timeless matches, the exceptions being the two in Pakistan.
https://stats.acscricket.com/Records/First_Class/Overall/Team/Highest_I
nnings_Run_Margin.html
Scanning further down the list, amidst all the usual suspects, I
spotted a win by an innings and 358 by Epsom [!] vs Middlesex, from 1815.
Sadly the actual scorecard is paywalled, but one suspects (a) that Epsom
didn't play that many f-c matches, and (b) that a score of at least 358
must have been pretty unusual in those days.
I'm a subscriber to CricketArchive, so can add a little detail.
Unfortunately the bowlers were not credited with dismissals where the
batsman was caught back then, and the runs conceded by each bowler were
seemingly not recorded either, so bowling analyses aren't available.
The match was scheduled for three days but completed in two. Middlesex
51 (with two batsmen run out) and 67 (with 3 batsmen "absent hurt" - one
suspects that they might have simply buggered off when it became clear
that a heavy defeat was inevitable). Epsom (Ladbroke 116, F Woodbridge
107, EC Woodbridge 70). According to the footnotes, "F Woodbridge passed
his previous highest score of 14 in First-Class matches". (But research
shows that it was only his third f-c match.) The footnotes don't mention
it, but I suspect that at the time the 476 might have been the highest
f-c innings total.
Thomas Lord, the founder of Lord's, was playing for Epsom. He was aged
59 and it was his final f-c match. His son, also Thomas Lord, was
playing for Middlesex.
According to Wikipedia, the 19th century Epsom club is first recorded on
28–29 July 1814 when it played Brighton at the Royal New Ground in
Brighton. Brighton won by 10 wickets. The club's last known important
match in 1819 was against Hampshire at Epsom Downs and they lost that by
135 runs. So it seems that their dominance against Middlesex may have
been something of a rarity.
--
John Hall
"I don't even butter my bread; I consider that cooking."
Katherine Cebrian